Funct. Mater. 2020; 27 4: 723-729.

doi:https://doi.org/10.15407/fm27.04.723

The effect of sign variable bending on structural damage to low-carbon steel

A.A.Briukhanov, N.A.Volchok, S.I.Iovchev, D.A.Dyachok, G.Gershtein, Z.A.Briukhanova

South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named K.Ushinsky, 26 Staroportofrankovskaya Str., 65020 Odesa, Ukraine

Abstract: 

The formation and change in the structure of microdamages during successive deformations by tension and compression in the sheets of low-carbon single-phase steel DC04 (0.06 % C, up to 0.35 % Mn, up to 0.40 % Si, ~ 0.025 % S and P) during alternating sign variable bending (SVB) were studied. The deformation of the annealed bands at the initial stage (0.25 cycles) leads to the formation of a structure with microdamages in the form of pores in the stretched region, to decreasing in the frequency (ν) of natural vibrations of rectangular samples and normal elastic modulus (E). Straightening of the steel strips (deformation of the 0.5 cycle SVB) leads to the degradation of damages formed at the previous stage of the SVB in the stretched region of the strips, which is repeated with each straightening of the samples. The damage coefficient (D) increases with bending and returns to a value close to the previous one after straightening the strips. Changes in D with a change in the tension - compression strain occur intensively in the initial stages of SVB (0.251 cycles). With an increase in the SVB deformation to 10 or more cycles, the level of degradation of damage during straightening of the samples decreases, and the damage coefficient decreases slightly. Damages accumulate in the form of pores that do not undergo changes when the type of deformation changes.

Keywords: 
deformation, alternating bending, damage, structure, Young's modulus, degradation.
References: 
1. J.Besson, D.Steglich, W.Brocks. Int. J. Plast., 19, 1517 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00022-0
 
2. S.Timoshenko, Strength of Materials, 3rd ed. Part 1. Elementary Theory and Problems, Krieger Publishing Company, Melbourne (Florida) (1976).
 
3. Yu.V.Zilberg, Theory of Metal Forming, Monograph, Porogi, Dnepropetrovsk (2009).
 
4. J.Goldstein, D.E.Newbury, D.C.Joy et al., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, Springer-Verlag, New York (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9
 
5. J.A.Lemaitre, Course on Damage Mechanics, Springer Verlag, Berlin and New York (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18255-6
 
6. W.F.Hosford, Overview of Tensile Testing, Tensile Testing, ed. by P.Han, ASM International, Lyon (1992).
 
7. A.A.Bryukhanov, G.Gerstein, Z.A.Bryukhanova et al., Phys. Metals Metallography, 120, 506 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X19020029
 
8. ASTM E1876-09 (2009) Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio by Impulse Excitation of Vibration. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, p.1181-1196.
 
9. J.V.Stratt, Theory of Sound, v.1, GITTL, Moscow (1955) [in Russian].
 
10. Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH, DC04 Mild Steels for Cold Forming Material No. according to 1.0338 DIN EN 10130, 1991 St 14 (FeP04).
 
11. G.Gerstein, T.Clausmeyer, K.Isik et al., J. Damage Mechanics, 26, 1147 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789516650245
 
12. Spectra PLUS 5.0.23 (FFT Spectral Analysis System), www.spectraplus.com, Pioneer Hill Software LLC, 24460 Mason Road NW,Poulsbo, WA 98370 USA
 
13. J.A.Lemaitre, J.Dufailly, Engin. Fract. Mechan., 28, 643 (1987).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(87)90059-2
 
14. A.Abdul-Latif, Int. J. Dam. Mech., 8, 316 (1999).
https://doi.org/10.1177/105678959900800403
 
15. N.A.Volchok, D.A.Dyachok, Z.A.Briukhanova, E.V.Dyshlov, Functional Materials, 27, 170 (2020).
 
16. Ya.D.Vishnyakov, A.A.Babareko, S.A.Vladimirov, I.V.Egiz, Theory of Texture Formation in Metals and Alloys, Nauka, Moscow (1979) [in Russian].
 

scow (1979) [in Russian].

Current number: