Funct. Mater. 2023; 30 (3): 447-452.

doi:https://doi.org/10.15407/fm30.03.447

Method for measuring X-ray reflections of microelements of inorganic compounds in soft tissues

I.F.Mikhailov1, V.V.Negoduyko2, R.M.Mikhaylusov2, A.I.Mikhailov1, S.S.Borisova1

1 National Technical University Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute, 2 Kyrpychova str., 61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine
2Military Medical Clinical Center of the Northern Region, 5 Kultury str., 61000, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Abstract: 

An alternative method is proposed for measuring X-ray diffraction peaks from micro-impurities of inorganic phases in soft tissues. Unlike traditional XRD, each of the diffraction peaks corresponding to the interplanar spacing di, is measured using radiation with a wavelength of λ -> 2di. This makes it possible to register diffraction peaks at large θ angles, thereby increasing the angular resolution ?tan?. This approach made it possible to increase the beam angular divergence Δθ from 0.05 (for standard XRD) to 3, gain ~(Δθ)2 in the spectrometer luminosity, and reduce ~(Δ θ)-2 radiation load per unit area of soft tissue. A criterion for choosing the wavelength and beam divergence based on the micro-impurity structure is proposed. The results of measuring the diffraction peaks of micro-impurities of iron oxides in soft tissues damaged by a fragment wound are presented. The excess iron content in damaged tissues was certified by the XRF method with calibration using standard samples and did not exceed 0.4 mass%. Measurements of the main diffraction peaks of iron oxides Fe2O3, d=2.69A?, as well as Fe3O4, d=1.61A? and FeO(OH), d=1.71A?, were carried out in Cl-α and Sc-α (,respectively. We used the scheme of a portable EDXRF spectrometer with a secondary KCl-Sc target and an angular beam divergence of Δθ ≈ 3°. Without radiation damage to soft tissues, the detection limits were reached: 0.12 mass% for Fe2O3, 0.059 mass% for Fe3O4 and 0.034 mass% for FeO(OH).

Keywords: 
X-ray diffraction, micro-impurities, soft tissues, EDXRF spectrometer, secondary target.
References: 

1. E.A. Ryan, M.J. Farquherson, Phys. Med. Biol., 52 6679 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/22/009

2. H. Cheng et al., Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Powder Diffraction Techniques; Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 27, 66 (2017),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.007

3. M. Ermrich, X-ray powder diffraction -XRD for the analysis, PANalytical GmbH (2011)

4. I.F Mikhailov, A.I. Mikhailov, A.A. Baturin, L.P. Fomina, Probl. Atom. Sci. Tech., 84, 172 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441213010089

5. Multicomponent Samples of the Composition of Metal Ion Solutions for Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry - 263-00001.

6. F. Gozzo, Quantitative phase analysis with diffraction methods, 13th Pharmaceutical Powder X-Ray Diffraction Symposium, (2015).

7. M.H. Schweitzer et al., Proc. Biol. Sci., 281, 1775 (2014). doi 10.1098/rspb.2013.2741.

8. M. Krispin, J. of Nanoparticle Research, 2012. Doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0664-4.

Current number: