Funct. Mater. 2023; 30 (4): 554-560.

doi:https://doi.org/10.15407/fm30.04.554

Effect of cementitious material composition on the mechanical properties of ultra-high strength concrete

Jiankai Liao

Department of Traffic and Municipal Engineering, Sichuan College of Architectural Technology, Sichuan Chengdu 610399, China

Abstract: 

In order to investigate the effect of cementitious material composition on the mechanical properties of ultra-high strength concrete, a series of UHSC were fabricated by changing the addition of silica fume (SF) and fly ash. The mechanical properties, including compressive strength, flexural strength, and splitting tensile strength, were evaluated using a hydraulic servo universal testing machine. Fracture parameters such as fracture toughness and characteristic length were measured using the three-point bend loading method after prefabricating a crack in the sample. The results showed that the strength of UHSC increased with SF content and the maximum compressive strength and flexural strength can reach 130.24 MPa and 20.61 MPa, respectively. Adding fly ash may decrease the compressive strength of UHSC slightly. UHSC exhibited pronounced brittle fracture characteristics, with an increasing brittleness trend as its strength rises. Incorporating fly ash into the concrete can enhance its characteristic length and fracture energy while diminishing its fracture toughness. Our study may offer recommendations to reduce the brittleness of ultra-high-strength concrete.

Keywords: 
UHSC, cementitious material composition, fracture toughness, brittleness, fracture energy
References: 

1. F. De Larrard;T. Sedran, Cement Concrete Research. 24, 997, (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90022-1

2. J.-J. Zeng,Y.-Y. Ye,W.-Y. Gao, et al., Journal of Building Engineering 30, 101243 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101243

3. S. Allena;C. M. Newtson, Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 5, 322-330 (2011).

4. C. Tasdemir,M. A. Tasdemir,F. D. Lydon, et al., Cement Concrete Research. 26, 63, (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00180-8

5. K. Liu,R. Yu,Z. Shui, et al., Construction and Building Materials 252, 119111 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119111

6. T. Vincent;T. Ozbakkaloglu, Composites Part B: Engineering 50, 413, (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.017

7. S. Wang,W. Xu;L. Yang, Construction and Building Materials 224, 19, (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.046

8. X. Yuan, G. Liao, Functional Materials 29, 401,(2022).
https://doi.org/10.15407/fm29.03.401

9. J. Walraven, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 7, 145, (2009).
https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.7.145

10. P. Richard;M. H. Cheyrezy, Special Publication 144, 507, (1994).

11. J. Liu,N. Farzadnia,C. Shi, et al., Cement concrete composite. 97, 175, (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.029

12. P. Thilakarathna,K. K. Baduge,P. Mendis, et al., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 234, 107080 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107080

13. Z. Wu,C. Shi;K. H. Khayat, Cement concrete composite. 71, 97, (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.05.005

14. D. S. Vijayan,P. Devarajan;A. Sivasuriyan, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 56, 103105 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103105

15. G. Golewski;T. Sadowski, Construction and Building Materials 143, 444, (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.137

16. M. Jalal;M. Tahmasebi, Science and Engineering of Composite Materials 22, 263,.(2015).
https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2013-0211

Current number: